Wednesday, November 12, 2014

FREE 5 CLASSIC ANGEL MOVIES NO SIGN-UP NO CATCHES!


PRESENTED BY THE BOOK
ANGELS & HEAVENLY VISITATIONS 
[THE BEST OF FATE MAGAZINE]

CLICK BELOW TO SEE
ANGEL ON MY SHOULDER
HEAVEN ONLY KNOWS
PASSING OF THE THIRD FLOOR BACK
BEYOND TOMORROW
MR. BEVIS
STORIES OF HEAVENLY VISITORS - AND THE DIFFERENCE
THEY MADE!





















READ TRUE ACCOUNTS OF ANGELIC ENCOUNTERS, GUARDIAN ANGELS AND HEAVENLY VISITORS IN THIS INSPIRING NEW BOOK!
LEARN HOW YOU CAN CONTACT THE ANGELS, HOW TO SEE THEM ALL AROUND YOU - AND MORE!










Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Read Free "How to See Your Guardian Angel and Become Attuned to Its Advice" from The Best of FATE Magazine - Angels and Heavenly Encounters



 Doubters often ask, "If guardian angels are all around us, how come I never see mine or hear the advice it gives?" Dawn C. Athay says anyone can learn to see and hear their guardian angel, and tells us how.

 HOW TO SEE YOUR GUARDIAN ANGEL AND BECOME ATTUNED TO ITS ADVICE

By Dawn C. Athay

 
I have always believed in guardian angels. After my son was born two years ago, I felt a newfound interest in spirituality, and I began trying to communicate with my guardian angel. I tried prayer, and even a Ouija board, all to no avail. Then I learned about Erica Chopich.
Chopich, a Los Angeles-based counselor, can see, hear, and talk to angels wherever she goes. With just a little practice, her methods can work for anyone who wants to contact the benevolent spirits that guide and protect all of us.
Chopich has seen angels since she was a child. She was taught, however, that her gift was shameful—so she blocked the angels out for 3.5 years. One day, however, her angel appeared to her and told her she must use her ability to help other people. At first she refused. As a doctor of psychology, she said, "I didn't want anybody to think I was nuts." But the angels were relentless. She saw them in shopping malls. She saw them in her sleep. She saw them everywhere. Finally she agreed to do readings for people.
Chopich explained that angels, or "master teachers," as she calls them, are really white light or colored energy. They often take human form, however, so that we can identify with them.
Everyone has a guardian angel who watches over them exclusively, Chopich said. There may be other spirits around us at times, checking on us or helping us, but our guardian angels never leave our side.
Chopich told me quite a bit about angels: Their love for us is divine, so pure that it's hard for us humans to understand, she said. We are the most important thing to them. We could never make them angry. We could never disappoint them. They never judge us. They just love us and try to steer us to the best path.
Every day of our lives, our angels try to put us in situations that will help us. They may put somebody to meet in our path. They might try to steer us to the right books or television shows. They even try to protect us from dangerous people and dangerous circumstances.
Our angels know us inside and out. They know our every thought, and they know what problems we have. They help us with family or work, and some times they delight us with good news to come. They are wise, and they have an answer for every question.
Sometimes, however, they won't answer our questions. That's because we are all students, here on this Earth to learn. Dealing with tough situations helps us grow—and growth is sometimes painful. Sometimes our angels will even test us to see if we have learned from experience.

Our Angels Protect Us
When I first met Chopich, she saw my angel right away, She described him to me: His name is "Michael," and he is very striking to look at. She said he is tall, thin, and powerful looking, with twinkling blue eyes and a quick smile, and full, dark, shoulder-length hair, with just enough grey to make him look very distinguished. He looks about 50 years old, she said.
I couldn't hear or see Michael. But Chopich did. She asked me if my right side was warmer than my left, because Michael was hovering there and stroking my hair. I was disappointed that I could not feel his presence, but she told me that in the future I would be able to, if I began working with him.
Michael was thrilled at the chance to talk with us. In fact, when she first made contact with him, Chopich had to tell him to slow down. Most angels, she said, are so happy to talk to her that they give her more information than she can take in at once.
Michael described some of the ways he had protected me during my lifetime. In return, I told Michael that once, when I tripped and broke my leg, it felt like somebody had pushed me. Michael admitted that he had pushed me, but he said that his push actually kept me from dislocating my hip, which would have been far more serious. I was thrilled to think that I had actually felt my guardian angel.
My husband, a construction worker, also had a reading with Chopich. He asked if his angel, named Daniel, had ever saved him from harm. Daniel laughed and said that he had saved him many, many times, especially at work.
Daniel said, "Remember that day at work when you dropped a tool, but nobody got hurt? That was me." My husband vividly remembered that day. He had dropped a heavy tool from a high ladder and he had jumped down to see if anyone was hurt, apologizing profusely because the tool could have killed anyone it had struck.
Daniel also described the day my husband and I installed new tiles on our roof. It had just started to rain when I looked up and saw my husband slip. I couldn't grab him—I could only scream as he slid down the roof. Just before he plunged off the edge, his fall stopped. There was nothing to stop him. He just stopped. The angel, Daniel, said he had stuck his leg out to stop him.

How to See Your Angel
Chopich said that with practice most of us can learn to see and hear our angels.
Chopich said we hear from our angels often, but we just don't realize it. Angels are very subtle. Often they will put inspirational ideas in our heads. When we accept their guidance, they're happy.
Angels are sad only when we lose our faith in God, or somehow feel unworthy of God's love. During those times, our guardian angels can be a wonderful bridge to God. Each time we pray, our angels pray with us. Our angels constantly encourage us to develop spiritually.
We need to think of guardian angels as our best friends, Chopich said. That includes talking to our angels every day.
Don't try too hard, she said. It's not like praying, for when you pray you close your eyes, concentrate, and send energy to God. If you want to talk to your angel, however, the key is in not trying at all. Keep it light. Praying is energy, but communicating with your angel is frequency. There is a difference. If you try too hard to connect with your angel, your frequency will drop like a rock.
You want to raise your frequency. Your angel will lower his or her frequency so the two of you can connect and communicate. If you raise your frequency even higher, perhaps you can see your angel.
Pick a time of the day when you feel your best. Try to think about your angel while doing little things around the house, like washing dishes, dusting, or mowing the lawn. Keep your thoughts light, almost like a butterfly. Keep your eyes open, because if you close them your frequency will drop. Think of your contact as being like a daydream.
You may start to hear a voice, or feel your angel's presence. You may begin to pick up the ideas your angel puts in your mind. It is all very subtle, but start to listen and eventually you will hear.


ANNOUNCING "THE BEST OF FATE MAGAZINE" ANGELS AND HEAVENLY VISITATIONS ONLY $2.99


Are Angels Real? "Yes!" say the editors, contributors, and readers of FATE magazine - and billions of people worldwide.
   Now you can read the best writing on those heavenly visitants, the angels, from the pages of FATE, the oldest and leading publication covering the fields of the paranormal, the occult, and the unexplained.

The first discussion of angels and heavenly visitations in FATE magazine appeared in 1948 in issue #1 in the form of a letter from a reader. The second, reprinted in this volume as "You Have a Guardian Angel", was published in our third issue and was written by the magazine's co-founder Raymond A. Palmer under his Robert W. Webster by-line. Palmer was a lifelong mystic who sincerely believed he and others heard the guiding voices of heavenly visitants.
   In the more than six decades since then, Fate has printed dozens of reports, articles, and reader letters chronicling the activities and nature of angels in general and guardian angels in particular. Gathered in this volume are some of the most pertinent and informative of those pieces. You will learn more than you thought possible about these eternally busy and helpful beings. You will also learn several ways to contact them, what they want every human being to know, and some the many different ways they have manifested themselves in the lives of people as varied as world-famous entertainers, homemakers, soldiers, and office workers.
   After finishing this book, we think doubters will find it harder to disbelieve, and believers will be more attuned to the heavenly presences that are all around us—and indeed frequently hold our lives and souls in their hands.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Stephen King on FATE Magazine, the World's Leading Publication of the Paranormal and the Unexplained

On the premier episode of the 2014 season of Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr.'s PBS television show, Finding Your Roots, Professor Gates asked prolific horror novelist Stephen King where he got his ideas for stories. King's reply stunned longtime readers of FATE, the oldest and most respected magazine in its field.



"I grew up interested in nightmares, scary stories, things that go bump in the night," King explained. "My mother used to read FATE magazine  Which was about the paranormal, flying saucers, and all that stuff.  She would read the stories to me and I was fascinated."

Now you can read The Best of FATE, a new series of books examining key subjects in the fields of the paranormal and the unexplained—such as UFOs, psychic healing, ghosts, angelic manifestations, ESP, and a great deal more—through in-depth studies drawn from the pages of FATE magazine.

Start now with...



CLICK BELOW TO BUY.











Friday, October 17, 2014

Read Free "Hard Evidence for UFOs" by Professor of Engineering, University of California, James A. Harder PhD

Whether or not science, or anyone, can tell us what UFOs are, depends on the nature and validity of the evidence for such encounters. Without real physical evidence, all we have to go on is that most unreliable of all forms of evidence, the testimony of human beings. In the following excerpt from the new book, The Best of FATE: UFOs and Close Encounters, James A. Harder, at Berkeley when he wrote this piece, takes a measured look at whether physical evidence that UFOs have landed exists, and if so, why scientists have not reported it. Then reports on the surprising conclusions he drew from his own personal metallurgical analysis of fragments found at the site of one UFO sighting.


The Hard Evidence for UFOs

By James A. Harder, Ph.D.

(1980)

In describing the hard evidence for UFO reality, I do not wish to detract from the vast amount of "softer" evidence which has been amassed during the past thirty years. Much of this has been in the form of eyewitness testimony from law enforcement officers and is from multiple witnesses to the same event, and although most of the sightings have been from distances in excess of a mile, a significant number have been of UFOs at close range and have been of such duration that conventional aircraft or ground vehicles cannot explain them. Were this sort of eyewitness testimony offered in a murder case, the offender would be convicted beyond any reasonable doubt.
One definition of "hard evidence" is that provided by artifacts from UFOs or fragments of UFOs recovered from crash sites. I shall be describing two such instances, plus two cases that do more than simply provide evidence to show doubters—they tell us something about the nature of UFOs.
The first case is that of the Brazilian magnesium fragments, well described by Dr. Olavo T. Fontes in Chapter Nine of the book The Great Flying Saucer Hoax by Coral E. Lorenzen and in a condensed form in Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, commonly known as the Condon Committee Report. These fragments were reportedly picked up in 1957 by a group of vacationers shortly after they observed the fiery explosion of a UFO above the surf near the town of Ubatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil, where they were fishing. Dr. Fontes tracked down the fragments and submitted them to two laboratories; they reported that one of the fragments was of unusually high-purity magnesium, with no impurities detectable by spectrographic analysis. A second fragment was entirely consumed in efforts to explain its unusual density (1.866 grams cc instead of the expected 1.741) by repeatedly dividing it to look for oxide inclusions; none were found except on the surface.
A third fragment was sent to the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization in the United States. The Condon Committee submitted it for analysis to the Alcohol and Tobacco Division of the Internal Revenue Service. The division also analyzed two highly purified samples of laboratory grade magnesium, Dow Chemical Company "triply sublimed" magnesium and "Grignard reagent grade" magnesium. The reported results are shown below:
Impurity Levels in Samples of Magnesium Metal (in PPM) as Determined by Neutron Activation Analysis

              Dow Mg. Triply Sublimed    Brazil UFO    Grignard Reagent Mg.
Manganese     4.8 + 0.                         35 + 5              150 + 20
Aluminum       N.D. (<5)                     N.D. (<10)      N.D. (<5)
Zinc                   5. + 1.                           500. + 100      3. + 1
Mercury           2.6 + 0.5                      N.D.                 N.D.
Chromium       5.9 + 12                       32.0 + 10         3. + 1.
Copper              0.4 + 0.2                     3.3 + 1.0          4.9 + 0.2
Barium             N.D.                              160. + 20        N.D.
Strontium        N.D.                              500. + 100.     N.D.

Manganese and aluminum values were obtained by gamma spectrometry and half-life measurement; zinc, mercury, and chromium values were obtained by gamma spectrometry alone; copper, barium, and strontium values were obtained by gamma spectrometry after radiochemical separation of the elements.
Because the Brazilian UFO magnesium "was found to be much less pure than the regular commercial metal produced in 1957 by the Dow Chemical Company in Midland, Michigan," the committee concluded that it need not have come from an extraterrestrial source.
The committee investigators discovered that in 1940 Dow had produced a seven hundred-gram sample of magnesium that contained about the same amount of strontium (an unusual addition), though they said nothing about the barium or zinc. The investigators also failed to note that the Brazilian UFO fragment had no detectable mercury, whereas the Dow magnesium had 2.6 PPM mercury. Thus if we assume that .5 PPM is the detection limit for mercury, the Brazil UFO fragment had to be at least five times as pure (in this component) as the Dow metal. Also note that the Brazil magnesium was on the order of four times the purity of Grignard reagent grade magnesium in the manganese component.
Now, a little bit of elementary algebra will show that there's no way to produce the UFO magnesium out of either or any combination of these laboratory-grade samples of magnesium. It is conceivable that somewhere in the world somebody could have gone to an extraordinary amount of trouble, starting with Dow triply sublimed magnesium, putting it through the purification process used for Grignard reagent grades, and planted the story and fragments with a gossip columnist. I suggest that logically this alternative hypothesis has a vanishingly small probability of being true.
Were there no other evidence for UFOs than this account supplies, most of us would accept this highly unlikely chain of events to explain the Brazil UFO magnesium fragments; what the UFO critics ask us to do, however, is to accept not one but hundreds of similarly unlikely alternative hypotheses in hundreds of other cases as well.
The very small number of apparent accidents like the one investigated by Fontes and described above has suggested an alternative hypothesis: that UFOs don't exist.
This notion is usually expressed in the question "If they're really here, why don't their craft ever malfunction?" Another hypothesis is that as part of a secrecy policy followed by the UFO intelligences such remains are recovered by the UFOs. Certainly the few instances in which artifacts have been recovered by human beings seem to be those in which the UFOs were unaware of the loss.
Such a case has been reported from Sweden. In 1956 two carpenters were returning from work one evening when suddenly the engine of their car stopped, just as they observed a large shining object coming from the sky on the right. They reported no sound but watched the object land in the road only about seventy-five meters ahead of them. They described it as being about fifteen meters across but not quite as high. After about eight or ten minutes it took off, lifting straight up for about ten meters and then accelerating quickly away. They had noticed that it was glowing, casting light for about one hundred meters around it, and gave a shimmering appearance, just as an asphalt pavement will do on a hot day.
Here I can do no better than to quote from a letter written by one of the men, Harry Sjoberg, to a Swedish UFO investigating organization, the IGF-UFO Sweden:
One November evening in 1956 I, Harry Sjoberg, and my friend Stig Ekberg were driving to the job we were doing at Vaddo. The trip took place on a Sunday evening, as we had been in Stockholm during the weekend. During the weeks we lived in a cottage we had rented near the working place.
As I remember this evening it was moonlight (full moon) and not a cloud in the sky. One Swedish mile or two (about six to twelve English miles) before we arrived at our cottage, we suddenly saw, to the right in the sky, a light which was moving in the direction of the moon, which was on the left side of the road. When the object had come over to the left side, it made a sharp yaw to the right and landed on the road about seventy to eighty meters in front of us. Just before that, the motor of the car had begun to give us trouble and was then quite silent.
Stig said the phenomenon must be a new sort of searching the army had, but I disagreed strongly. This, I was sure, was something exceptional.
I remember that the road was about fifteen meters wide and that the object covered the whole road. I can imagine that it was about fifteen meters wide, and I estimate the height to be about four meters. To say something about the color—well, it was rather flat. The shades in the central section were steel-gray with a tinge of light yellow, the upper and lower sides somewhat reddish or orange.
I don't recall any smell but I do remember that it felt heavy to breathe. But this may be due to the fact that I live in a central part of Stockholm and now had come out of the city into the fresh sea air.
When the object had risen and disappeared out of our sight, we got out of the car to investigate the reason that the motor had stopped functioning. Stig opened the motor hood and began with a check of the cables from the battery to the distributor housing and the ignition plugs, but he could find nothing wrong. So he asked me to get into the car and try to start it, and it started without trouble. Stig took his seat behind the steering wheel to drive on to the cottage.
I wanted him to stop where we assumed that we had seen the shining object lying. Stig was anxious to return to the cottage as soon as possible, but at my insistence we stopped.
The first thing I noticed when I got out of the car was that the high grass growing along the ditch bank and inward from the road had been flattened in a curved area from the road, on both sides of the road. The light from the full moon lit the road brilliantly. Stig provided further light with his flashlight. Suddenly the flashlight beam caught some object which we at first thought was an oddly shaped stone. When Stig picked it up, it was warm. When I got it in my hand, I knew from its weight that it must be some kind of metal, and comparing the weight with the small size, I realized that the specific weight must be high. Stig took the "stone" and put it in the glove compartment, and we drove on to the cottage at Vaddo.
At the end of the week we went back to Stockholm. When I told my friends about the event, none of them believed me. Everybody said that it must be a joke or that our eyes were deceiving us. So I decided from then on to keep quiet about it.
In the summer of 1957 Stig and I met a metallurgist. Stig asked him if he would care to look at a metal piece we had found. The metallurgist saw it and suggested that it might be platinum, but he gave us the address of a laboratory that could analyze the piece. This was done but without result. After tests and research at two other laboratories, the metal piece was returned to Stig, divided into three smaller pieces, but with no information about the material of the piece. After that the metal pieces remained lying about for several years.
Some years ago, when Stig was in a bookstore, he heard a young man asking for books about flying saucers. Stig engaged him in conversation and learned that the man was connected with the Swedish UFO group. And that is how we came to write to you about our experience.
What we saw at Vaddo in 1956 was no vision, but a flying saucer that for some reason had force-landed to exchange a damaged part and for some reason had left the exchanged part where we found it.
The fifty-gram piece was sent to the National Enquirer as part of its UFO reward program and then to APRO for analysis. Our findings confirmed that it was extraordinarily dense, 14.92 grams/cc, and a spectrographic analysis showed that it was predominantly tungsten carbide, cemented with a small quantity of cobalt. Scanning electron microscope photographs showed the crystal structure to be very fine, with individual crystals ranging in size from one to three microns in diameter with a mean of 1.5 microns. This suggests a cemented structure that is produced by powdered metallurgy for tool bits. But comparison with a typical large tool bit, approximately the same size as the fragment, showed a density only on the order of 12.5; however, we found that carbide inserts used as cutting edges for large circular saws were very much smaller but were manufactured to a comparable density by a combination of heat and high pressures. So there is nothing in terms of composition except its unusual size combined with high density that can clearly distinguish it from terrestrial cutting tools.
Tungsten-carbide cutting edges are used in machining because they can hold an extremely hard edge at red heat. But the Swedish artifact has none of the characteristics of a cutting tool. Four surfaces are very flat, to be sure, but all of the edges are well rounded (except where it is broken at the sixth face) and seem polished. The two larger parallel sides are slightly tapered (less than 1/1000); when measured for flatness, there was no observable deflection, on a machinist's dial gage that could be estimated to 1/10,000 inch, over a distance of .75 inches. The apex, or nose, is smoothly rounded in three dimensions, with radii of curvature about five mm. The thickness is twelve mm; the two converging sides are each about twenty-two mm long and form an included angle of 75°. None of these characteristics agrees with the form of a cutting-tool blank. To have a machine form this piece would be an extraordinarily difficult task, even for a skilled machinist: tungsten carbide cannot be cut, except by a diamond wheel, and must be ground using diamond abrasives, excepting for the minor sharpening done with a carbide wheel in shops.
Moreover, despite their very good flatness, the surfaces seem somewhat pocked by tiny pits resembling the micro-meteorite pits found on lunar rocks. There is one gouge, about four mm long and one mm deep along one of the rounded edges; the most interesting aspect of this gouge is that it does not have the fracture type of edge but seems almost flame-polished or ablated. This supports an hypothesis that the fragment has been exposed to outer-space micrometeorites, or perhaps has suffered reentry ablation.
We tried looking for cosmic-ray tracks in the carbide crystals but found none. Reportedly the fragment was subject to a melting attempt with the use of an oxyacetylene welding torch in Sweden, and this would be expected to anneal out such tracks (the melting point of tungsten carbide is 3143°K, nearly 5200°F, so the attempt was unsuccessful). So far we have found no anomalous isotope ratios.
I find it mildly amusing that UFO critics have frequently said that if UFOs were real, we would find physical evidence of them, perhaps at crash sites. But when shown physical evidence, they argue that it cannot be valid because UFOs are not real.
The above examples are of physical artifacts. Next I should like to turn to evidence which is somewhat softer but which nevertheless is instrumented—that is, a camera or other aid to observation was employed. Moreover, in each of the two cases, some intriguing quantitative data were obtained.
One is the Sedona photographic case, first published in the APRO Bulletin. The photograph was taken by C. Dwight Ghormley on September 23, 1967, near Sedona Arizona. Ghormley observed what looked like a large cylindrical but bright propane tank in a horizontal position on the ground three-quarters of a mile off the highway and decided to photograph it with his Kodak "Holiday" 127 camera. But after he released the shutter and turned to roll the film to the next frame, he could see only a cloud of smoke or dust. He estimated that the object was three-fourths of a mile away, based on its position relative to the background bluff.
By a stroke of luck Ghormley took the film to be developed to the photo shop of an APRO member, N. C. "Mac" McEntarfer of Flagstaff, who recognized its value and has been able to find the original photographer, the negative, and the camera. Ghormley, the photographer, has been cooperative and helpful and has provided APRO with the negative and the camera for evaluation. Apparently Ghormley released the shutter at nearly the exact moment (actually about .005 second later) that the UFO began a nearly vertical ascent. The rest of the story is provided by the film record.
The camera was an inexpensive model with a fixed focus, single-speed shutter, and a fixed lens opening. When examined in my laboratory in April 1973, the shutter opened (from 10 percent to 90 percent) in five milliseconds (ins), remained open for a duration of twenty to twenty-eight ms., and closed in four ms. The duration showed a time random fluctuation, partly due to the different pressures used to press the release and apparently partly due to some stickiness in its operation. The calculated effective speed was thus 1/35 second. This camera was reported to have a shutter speed of 1/75 second, so I then flooded the shutter mechanism with ethylene dichloride solvent and found that the rise time remained at five ms., but the duration was shortened to eleven to fourteen ms. and the fall or closing time to three ms. After this cleaning the effective shutter speed was 1/60 second, which was probably closer to its speed when new. The shutter speed in 1967 was probably some value between these two, and I will assume a duration of twenty-plus ms., an opening time of five ms., and a closing time of four ms.
From the focal length of the lens and the length distance to the object and the length of the trace on the negative, we can calculate the distance (at right angles to the line of sight) that the object moved. Measurements from the negative show that from the lowest barely visible image to the brightest of the images is .14 inches; from the brightest image to the last distinct image is .20 inches, and above that there is a faint trace .10 inches long, for a total length of .44 inches. At a distance of four thousand feet from the camera, this represents a transverse distance of seven hundred feet traversed in approximately 29 ms. The calculated speed is thus on the order of twenty-four thousand feet per second, or sixteen thousand miles per hour.
This is indeed a very high speed, but it is still within the range of speeds measured by radar (as for example in the Lakenheath, England, case). It is high enough to give the appearance of "disappearance" to a nearby observer, insofar as it is more than several times the speed of a rifle bullet.
One of the most fascinating aspects of the photograph is the large number of distinct images that appear. From their density on the negative, which is greater than that of the brightest part of the sky, we infer that the object was quite bright and that possibly the distinct images are due to a flashing on and off of a light source. Since each flash could be no more than about .001 second (one ms.) in duration and the sky was exposed for the entire shutter opening, the object brightness was on the order of twenty-five to fifty times as bright as the sky.
Interestingly, the density of the first several images increases steadily from the beginning of the trace to the point where, on the basis of a uniform velocity, one would expect the shutter to be fully opened. A similar observation is not possible at the end of the trace, where the images fade into the cloud background. Critics have suggested that the traces are but a lens flare. They do not, however, look like any lens flare known to the writer, and it seems unlikely that a single-lens camera would show such multiple images of the sun. To support such a theory one would have to claim that Ghormley was perpetrating a hoax (since he claimed he did see the UFO on the ground and the cloud of dust). But who would expect a hoaxer to produce such an unlikely photograph of a UFO?
A second instrumented observation was made by Wells A. Webb in 1953. It has provided evidence of something similar to a very strong magnetic field surrounding the UFO he observed. When he first saw the object, it appeared to be a fuzzy white oblong object at an altitude angle of about 45°, azimuth north. Its length was about half the diameter of a full moon, its width about one-third its length. He observed no change in appearance when it was observed with and without Polaroid glasses.
After about five minutes the object had moved to a position 30° eastward; it then suddenly became circular in appearance and no longer moved but became gradually smaller. In this position he observed three concentric dark rings around the object; the largest was about six times the diameter of the object. The rings were visible only when viewed with Polaroid glasses.
Webb repeatedly looked with and without glasses. The sky was clear blue and the time (10:00 A.m.), and the position in the sky suggested to the writer that the rings were the result of the rotation of polarized light scattered from the atmosphere. That the rings were about one-third width of their spacing again suggests the Faraday effect. Assuming the Verdet constant for the sodium line to apply (V = 6.8 X 10-° minutes arc/gauss-cm) at sea-level conditions, we can infer a maximum rotation of about 450° (90 plus two times 180) was caused by a magnetic field of 4 X 10° gauss-cm, or a field of 100 gauss extending over a distance of forty meters, according to my calculations. The Wells A. Webb observation is the first known instrumented observation (other than camera) of a UFO.
If what Webb observed was due to a magnetic field, it could have been produced only by a steady field, or one in which the field strength changes as in a square wave. An ordinary alternating sine-wave field would smear out the rotation. Such a huge, steady field would have a noticeable attractive effect on any iron object in the vicinity of the UFO; this is not reported, except in some of the levitation reports, which of course are not restricted to iron objects. On the other hand, a very high frequency high-intensity magnetic field could cause some of the other effects reported on electrical machinery and in connection with the stopping of automobile internal-combustion engines depending on a spark ignition.
The above four examples do not do justice to the very large number of cases which constitute the hard evidence for UFO reality. But these represent hard evidence of a sort that has involved physical evidence and instrumented observations which not only prove the existence of UFOs but also provide hard evidence of scientific value as well.

CLICK BELOW TO BUY.


ANNOUNCING "THE BEST OF FATE: UFOs AND CLOSE ENCOUNTERS"

FATE Magazine and Digital Parchment Services are proud to present...


  
True reports of extraterrestrial contacts and flying saucers from the pages of the world's leading magazine of the paranormal and the unexplained.

FATE is pleased to bring you the fascinating story of Unidentified Flying Objects, told through key reportsfrom the encounter that started it all in 1948 to 21st century sightings worldwideselected from the magazine's 700-plus issues. Read the stories recounted by such notables as:
  • Kenneth Arnold, the pilot whose 1949 account launched the modern fascination with flying saucers;
  • James A. Harder, professor of engineering at the U.C. Berkeley, whose metallurgical analysis of UFO remains may prove their extraterrestrial origin;
  • Cambridge historian Harold T. Wilkins, who has surveyed over 1,000 years of UFO sightings.
  • Utah State University professor Frank B. Salisbury, PhD, and his meditation on whether science alone is adequate to explain the existence of extraterrestrial phenomena;
  • Renowned UFOlogist Jaques Vallee, who offers possible extradimensional, psychic or spiritual explanations;
  • Geologist Robert M. Schoch, PhD, and his hypothesis on a connection between UFOs and Lost Civilizations;
  • And much, much more, including authentic personal reports of UFOs seen around the world and even beneath the seas. 
You will not find any final answers or solutions—they still don't yet exist, contrary to what some people might tell you. But you will find sensible, clear-headed perspectives on the greatest riddle of our time, as seen by its prevailing experts. And it's a good bet that when the solution is found, it will be due in no small part to the efforts of the individuals who have contributed to this book—and to the most thought-provoking publication of all time: FATE Magazine.

CLICK BELOW TO BUY.




Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Read Free "How a Voice from Grave Named Killer" from The Best of FATE Magazine - Psychic Detectives


Did a Voice from the Grave Name Killer? 

By Lesley Sussman

from The Best of FATE Magazine

 PSYCHIC DETECTIVES & PSYCHIC CRIMES

Purchase Psychic Detectives and Psychic Crimes at Amazon.

$2.99 for Kindle.

For Chicago police detectives Joseph Stachula and Lee Epplen the case began routinely enough. Its ending is something both policemen will probably never forget.
 
On the night of February 21, 1977, police found the body of a forty-eight-year-old woman in her fifteenth-floor high-rise apartment on Pine Grove Avenue in the city. The woman had been stabbed several times, and her burned body, wrapped in bed sheets, was lying on the floor.

The victim was identified as Teresita Basa, a former Manila socialite who came to the United States from the Philippine Islands in the 1960s. She received a master's degree in music from Indiana University and eventually worked as a respiratory therapist in Edgewater Hospital on Chicago's far north side.

This was all police investigators Joseph Stachula and Lee Epplen had to go on when they were handed the assignment of finding Teresita Basa's murderer.
In the days that followed the police turned up little. They did learn that Miss Basa had been a warm, outgoing person and that she had many friends. No one knew who might have wanted to kill her. Stachula suspected that the victim had been murdered as the result of a lover's quarrel but dismissed that theory after questioning her boyfriend.

After two months of police work, all investigators had on the case was a complete profile of the dead woman and a handwritten note found in her apartment which read: "Get tickets for A. S."


In the press of other police matters, Stachula and his partner had almost forgotten the case when they received a call from the police department in Evanston, Illinois, the suburb just north of Chicago's city limits.


Evanston police asked Stachula whether he had ever heard of an orderly who worked at Edgewater Hospital by the name of Allan Showery. Stachula said no. Then, with noticeable constraint, the Evanston police suggested that he contact a doctor and his wife who lived in their suburb.


Several days later Stachula and Epplen knocked on the apartment door of Dr. Jose Chua and his wife Remibias, both natives of the Philippines like the victim Teresita Basa.

Stachula recalls that the couple was very uneasy. "I told them we had information that they might know something about the case," Stachula says. "They seemed nervous and made some small talk. Finally, Dr. Chua asked me if I believed in the occult or in exorcism."

The policemen were noncommittal and asked Chua to tell them what he knew. The doctor then began a tale so incredible that to this day both Stachula and Epplen find it difficult to believe.

Chua said strange things first began to happen to his wife five months after Miss Basa was murdered. He said one evening Remibias abruptly got up from a living room chair and, with a strange expression on her face, walked into the bedroom. The doctor, sensing something was wrong, followed his wife into the other room and found her lying on the bed in what he described as a trancelike state. When he asked what the matter was, the doctor said his wife spoke to him in a voice that was not her own.

"She spoke in Tagalog [the national language of the Philippines] but with a strange Spanish accent," Chua said. "She said, 'Ako'y II am Teresita Basa.'"

The doctor told the policemen he remembered feeling frightened. He said he had experienced many strange things during his career as a surgical assistant, but he had never heard anyone speak in a voice that was not his own.

Chua said the voice, which claimed to belong to Miss Basa, told him she was murdered by Allan Showery, a man she had worked with at the hospital. The voice also said Showery was in her apartment because he wanted to steal her jewelry.

For almost half an hour Mrs. Chua continued to speak in the voice of the slain woman, the doctor told the investigators. When the trance ended as suddenly as it began, he said Mrs. Chua remembered nothing about the experience but only felt very thirsty.

The policemen, skeptical of this story, asked Chua if he or his wife had known the dead woman. The doctor answered no – a statement which later proved to be false. He said his wife also had worked in the hospital's respiratory unit but on a different shift.

Still suspicious, thinking the couple might be pulling some sort of hoax, the policemen played their ace. Both Stachula and Epplen knew from the pathological report on Miss Basa that the victim was still a virgin – a fact that had been kept secret in the case.

Stachula asked Chua if the voice told him she had been raped.

"No," replied Chua. "All she said was that she had been murdered."

The police investigators then questioned Mrs. Chua who admitted she had known the slain woman slightly. She also admitted knowing Showery because he too worked as an orderly in the respiratory unit. She had nothing more to add concerning the voice that had possessed her.

The doctor told the police he and his wife had discussed what had happened but had decided not to report it because they feared ridicule. However, the voice from the grave would not leave his wife alone, he said.

A few days later the "spirit" of the dead woman once again took possession of his wife, the doctor said. This time, Chua added, the voice was more persistent in pleading that he tell the police.

Chua said he told the voice that the police would need evidence if they were to make an arrest. It was then, he said, that the voice told him that jewelry taken from Miss Basa's apartment by Showery could still be found in his possession. The voice also identified a pearl cocktail ring which it said Showery had given as a present to his common-law wife.

Despite such evidence, Chua said he and his wife still were reluctant to approach police. The doctor said he briefly mentioned what had happened to his hospital superiors but they too were indecisive about informing authorities.

Chua said it took a third visit from what the couple now believed was the spirit of Miss Basa to convince them they must seek police help. They contacted Evanston police.

Now they were telling their incredible story for the second time.

Stachula still recalls his amazement when Chua finished his tale. He made note of his feelings in a written report to his commanding officer after the detectives arrested Showery and charged him with murder.

"To this day I'm not quite sure whether I believe how the information was obtained," he wrote. "Nonetheless, everything here is completely true."

However baffled the policeman might have felt, at least the case was over. And whatever force prompted Mrs. Chua to speak in a dead woman's voice, the "tip" from the grave had proven to be accurate.

Not only had Stachula and Epplen located some of Miss Basa's stolen jewelry in the orderly's apartment but, just as the voice had indicated, the detectives found Showery's common-law wife wearing a pearl cocktail ring.

Under questioning by the investigators the orderly signed a statement that robbery was his motive for entering the slain woman's apartment that evening. The detectives arrested Showery and charged him with murder.

In August 1977, six months after the murder, Stachula and Epplen marked the strange case closed. The less said about it the better they thought and turned their attention to other police matters.

But the bizarre incidents surrounding the case were not destined to remain buried in a "closed" police report. Chicago's Filipino community is close-knit, and rumors about spirits of the dead having solved Miss Basa's murder continued to circulate.

Shortly after Showery's arrest, a veteran crime reporter formerly with the Manila Chronicle got wind of the story. Gus Bernardo, now working in Chicago as managing editor for the bi-monthly Philippines Herald, persuaded his publisher Eduardo Fernandez to let him track down the story.

Bernardo says he ran into a wall of silence. Chicago police wanted the case to remain buried. His publisher also failed to convince police they should let him see the case report.

"The police didn't want to reveal all the things that Mrs. Chua said about the case," Fernandez says. "They refused to cooperate."

But the Herald's managing editor had an advantage in his many personal contacts in the city's Filipino community. Within days of the orderly's arrest, Bernardo had pieced together the bizarre story.

Especially fortunate for the newspaperman was his discovery that he knew the Chuas who were named in the case. He contacted the couple, and they repeated their story for him.

Bernardo did some more investigating. He interviewed Mrs. Chua's Filipino co-workers and talked to other people who knew the doctor and his wife. By the time he finally wrote the story, Bernardo was – and still is – convinced that he had come across a true case of spirit possession.

"I've covered murders for years," Bernardo says. "I know what's a crime and what's not. I know when people are lying to me. I found everything the Chuas said to be true."

Bernardo also says one of the most startling pieces of evidence did not appear in his article because he learned of it after the story was published.

"I was contacted by some people in the hospital who worked with Mrs. Chua," he says. "These sources told me that there were a couple of times when Mrs. Chua broke out singing in the dead woman's voice. They said they were frightened and reported it to their supervisor."

Bernardo's article appeared on the front page of the Philippines Herald on August 16, 1977 – seven months before an almost identical story appeared on the front page of the city's largest newspaper, the Chicago Tribune. But the only attention the Herald's article received was from a police official who called Bernardo to congratulate him on a good job.

Again, this unusual story of a dead woman's vengeance fell into obscurity.

But all that changed on March 5, 1978, when the Tribune ran a front page account of the Basa murder. The paper's headline posed the question: "DID VOICE FROM THE GRAVE NAME KILLER?"

The Tribune learned of the bizarre case when an attorney for the thirty-one-year-old orderly, Allan Showery, requested all police records on file. Showery was nearing trial. Once again the Chuas testimony was being discussed – this time in public.

But along with the article came the first public expressions of doubt.

Shortly after the newspaper story appeared, an Edgewater Hospital official told the reporter on a local newspaper that not only did Mrs. Chua know the slain woman well but she had worked side by side with her for two years. Police -later stated they were aware of this discrepancy in Dr. Chua's statement. The hospital spokesman said Mrs. Chua also had worked with Showery.

"There's no way they couldn't know each other," stated Brad Cummings, the hospital spokesman. "They do team therapy in that unit. They worked side by side. They were all very close."

Cummings added that, although Mrs. Chua worked alongside Showery for two years, she made it known to several of her associates that she did not like him.

"She was very open about that fact," says Cummings. "She made it clear she didn't like him."

The hospital spokesman said he had his own theory about the case. He believed that Mrs. Chua acted out the voice from the grave as a way to tell police what she already suspected – that Showery had been responsible for Miss Basa's murder.

"I think she might have known something about Showery but also knew she would be taking chances with her own life and her husband's life if she went directly to the police," Cummings says.

He adds that after police arrested the orderly they recovered some of Miss Basa's missing jewelry from women at the hospital to whom Showery gave the items as gifts.

"It could be that Mrs. Chua recognized some of that jewelry," Cummings suggests.

Whatever Mrs. Chua may have thought or suspected, she continued to work in close contact with Showery for several months after Miss Basa's death. But then, on July 16, 1977, something unusual happened.

Mrs. Chua, who is described by the director of her unit as a model employee, walked into the hospital that afternoon and "totally blew up" at her immediate supervisor, Ted Ellis.

Ellis, who coincidentally lived in the same building as Showery, said he remembers that day because of Mrs. Chua's sudden flare-up.

"It was a Saturday and she came in with her husband," he recalls. "I didn't know what she was doing on the premises because she doesn't work on Saturdays."

The supervisor says Mrs. Chua started complaining about her job and then "exploded at me out of the clear blue sky." He says the conversation had nothing to do with Miss Basa's murder.

Witnesses recall that during the argument Dr. Chua walked over to Showery and, in an angry voice, said to him, "I know you. I know a lot about you."

Mrs. Chua was fired that afternoon for "gross insubordination" and told to report back to the hospital for official notification. When she returned the following week Mrs. Connie Kuhn, director of the respiratory unit, told the woman her dismissal was permanent.

Mrs. Kuhn remembers Mrs. Chua telling her, "I'm relieved because I'm scared of the people I work with. I'm especially fearful of Allan Showery."

It was around the time of her dismissal that Mrs. Chua began to speak in Miss Basa's voice – a phenomenon that Bernardo, his publisher and others say was not a ruse to ease a guilty conscience.

"These are intelligent and respected people in the community," states the Herald's managing editor. "If she suspected something they didn't have to wait so long to tell police.

"All they had to do was give the police the information without anyone knowing who gave it to them. Instead, they identified themselves."

Bernardo's publisher admits that it's a "strange" case but also describes the Chuas as being very respectable. "It may all sound like superstition," he says, "but as a child I often heard stories of spirits from the grave."

Other persons also support the supernatural aspects of the Chua's testimony. "In the Philippines there are many people who believe this is common," claims Mrs. Nancy Pabico, now a Chicago resident. 'Where I come from we believe in the spirit of the dead coming back through another person after three days."

One person who is willing to accept the Chuas' testimony is Thomas J. Organ, a top state prosecutor who is known for his no-nonsense approach to the law. Organ has been especially appointed to handle this unusual case. The prosecutor may have a vested interest in believing the Chuas but says his skepticism waned after interviewing Dr. Chua, whom he now describes as a "learned professional and a reputable person." He also frankly admits that in five years as a prosecutor, "I've never run into anything like this."

Police officials, meanwhile, are finding themselves a bit uncomfortable with the publicity surrounding this controversial case. After all, it isn't every day that one of the nation's largest police forces solves a case with supernatural assistance.

Even Stachula and Epplen are "not available" for phone calls that have anything to do with the Basa murder.

Privately, however, police officials admit the voice from the grave may have been concocted by the Chuas but state what is really important is that enough evidence was presented to them so that an arrest could be made.

Police do not believe the couple was involved in the murder.

Commander Joseph DeLeonardi, one of the city's top homicide detectives, best sums up the police department's attitude regarding the entire bizarre episode: "She gave us the evidence we needed. It doesn't matter if she had a psychic dream or not."

For the Chuas, however, life may never be the same. Hounded by reporters from around the world eager for more details about the sensational case, they have had to change apartments, phone numbers and jobs.

Currently the Chuas are living incognito somewhere in Chicago. Even their lawyer will make no statements about what has happened to his clients. But in an earlier interview Mrs. Chua expressed her feelings about what transpired.

"It's been traumatic for me and my husband," she said.

On January 21, 1979, Allan Showery went on trial for the murder of Teresita Basa. After three days of testimony the jury considered the charges, deliberating for thirteen hours before announcing it was hopelessly deadlocked. Judge Frank W. Barbaro declared a mistrial.

A month later Showery appeared before Judge Barbaro and, acting against the advice of his attorneys who wanted him to stand a second trial, admitted his guilt. He was sentenced to fourteen years in prison for murder and to four years each for two counts of armed robbery and arson.

***
FATE is the longest-running and most widely-respected magazine devoted to the paranormal. During its 66 years as the leading publication in its field, FATE has published expert opinions and personal experiences relating to UFOs, psychic abilities, ghosts and hauntings, cryptozoology, alternative medicine, divination methods, belief in the survival of personality after death, predictive dreams, telepathic communication, and other paranormal topics. Many of these challenge our very concept of reality, suggesting at the very least that this world is a far stranger place than most of us suspect. For this volume of our Best of FATE series, the editors of the magazine open their files to examine true accounts of crimes—often acts of murderous violence—both perpetrated and solved by paranormal means. Here, gathered from the over seven hundred issues of FATE, are some of the most impressive instances of psychic crime-solving and psychic crimes, offering hours of fascinating reading for anyone interested in the strange, the paranormal or the occult.



Purchase Psychic Detectives and Psychic Crimes at Amazon.

$2.99 for Kindle.